M HYPE SPLASH
// news

Equivalence relation in a simple directed graph $D$

By Abigail Rogers
$\begingroup$

I have written my proof, but I'm still not sure if it's rigth:

Determine if for all directed graphs $D$ the following relation $R$ defined in $V(D)$ is an equivalence relation: $xRy$ if and only if $x=y$ or there is an $xy$-path directed.

  • Reflexivity: It's reflexive because if $x = x'$ and then $x' = x$ then by definition it holds, but not sure about the path because since $D$ is simple, there can't be the $x$ $x$ edge

  • Simetry: It is not symetric because a directed path existing from $x$ to $y$ does not imply that there is some directed path from $y$ to $x$.

  • Transitivity : We uppose there is a directed path from $x$ to $y$ and a directed path from $y$ to $z$. Then we procede to cancontenate this paths and we get de $xz$ path. But here I'm not sure because this might not be a path because it could possibly have repeated edges if some edge or edges appeared in both paths involved in the concatenation

Any help?

$\endgroup$ 4 Reset to default

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy